« Wikipedia's Arcane Rules Censor Health Information | Home | E-patients Unite To Document Problems with Generic Drug »
April 22, 2008
Why Doesn't My Doctor Answer My Email?
Because he or she is afraid -- afraid of being overwhelmed by one more responsibility, of not being reimbursed for time spent answering emails, of patient privacy, of HIPAA, and of course, of legal liability if they set an expectation of replying to emails in a timely manner and -- for technical or other reasons -- don't get to the one that results in a patient's death or disability. The Associated Press has the story, It's no LOL: Few US doctors answer e-mails from patients, and it's an ironic read:
[Most Americans] want the convenience of e-mail for non-urgent medical issues, but fewer than a third of U.S. doctors use e-mail to communicate with patients, according to recent physician surveys.
"People are able to file their taxes online, buy and sell household goods, and manage their financial accounts," said Susannah Fox of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. "The health care industry seems to be lagging behind other industries."
Isn't it ironic that you can engage in the most sensitive of financial transactions, ranging from filing your taxes, managing your bills and bank accounts, and buying and sellings thousands of dollars worth of stock online. But you can't email your doc, look at your own medical charts or lab results, or virtually manage anything having to do with your health care. Fidelity can tell me how much money I've saved for retirement in two clicks of a mouse. Yet my local doctor/hospital combination can't give me access to my medical record, lab tests, or billing records.
Are doctors' fears founded? Well, not via any rational reading of the research:
Most studies have shown patients don't abuse e-mail. They generally don't deluge doctors with rambling messages, and Internet exchanges may even help doctors' productivity and cut down on office visits.
For example, a 2007 University of Pittsburgh study published in the journal Pediatrics followed 121 families who e-mailed their doctors. Researchers found 40 percent of e-mails were sent after business hours and only about 6 percent were urgent. Doctors received on average about one e-mail a day and responded 57 percent faster than by telephone.
The problem is that whenever new technology is introduced, there is a temporary lag before it is completely and wholly embraced. This lag is more pronounced with technology introduced into a specific field or industry. Automobile unions didn't just one day embrace the use of robotic assemblers in car factories -- in fact, they fought long and hard to prevent their use for years. The Web was introduced long before it gained sufficient momentum to host the likes of Facebook. Virtual worlds have existed online since the 1980s, but only now seem to be coming into their own.
Computers have made significant inroads into the health care field in the past decade, especially for doctors' own use. They've already helped reduce prescription and medication errors, and have been invaluable in speeding up imaging and making technology like functional MRI possible.
But some things, like breaking down the doctor-patient communication barriers, are not just a function of technology and technology adoption. There are significant psychological and sociological factors at work here, and only time and a new generation of e-patient-friendly doctors is going to change them wholesale.
Until that time, you'll just have to get used to your doctor not answering your email.
Posted by John Grohol at April 22, 2008 6:34 PM | blog this | Email to a friend
Comments
All of the discussion of technology, privacy, time constraints, liability and sociological trends is missing the real issue: doctors can't afford to provide uncompensated services.
Insurance payments are tied to services provided in the office, face-to-face. Anything else is free. Why should a highly trained professional with big overhead expenses runnning a small business give away his/her expertise?
Those doctors who do it generally are going to be salaried employees of university hospitals (e.g. Beth Israel Deaconess in the article) who have no overhead and get paid regardless of how many patients they see, staff model HMOs (which have an incentive to reduce, not increase patient visits) and "boutique" providers who charge patients an annual fee to cover these uncompensated services.
Posted by: Stuart at April 22, 2008 8:03 PM
> you'll just have to get used to your doctor not answering your email.
Oh, posh. :) Some bloggers will stop at nothing to get me to curse, but it won't work this time.
Fellow patients out there - THINK: you do have a choice. My primary, my oncologist, my orthopedist, my urologist - all reply to my emails. (They're all at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, but that's not the only place that's like that.)
Three of the four use PatientSite, the hospital's secure email system (sort of like using email on your bank's web site). But even without that, it's really wonderful to get this form of support.
Your doctor may appreciate knowing there are precedents and well established guidelines:
- an article from the American Medical Informatics Association.
- The AMA has published Guidelines for Patient-Physician Electronic Mail (H-478.997)
- This page has several other references.
Print, snip & save. :)
YOU DO HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO REQUEST THAT YOUR DOCTOR COMMUNICATE IN A WAY THAT WORKS FOR YOU. And if they decline, you have a right (if you wish) to find a doctor who will. Just ask. Some do, some don't.
p.s. Please also be aware of the Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative, which, among other things, is working to let doctors *be* paid for time spent in communication, both by email and phone. PCPCC appears to be a very good group, fighting for changes to let doctors actually spend time taking care of you.
Posted by: e-Patient Dave at April 22, 2008 8:46 PM
Really now. Shall the doctors also be tied down to computers? My spouse is constantly paged all hours of the day and night and answers calls promptly. There is NO reimbursement for these calls, unlike the fees attorneys charge for calls. If you wish for your doctor to be on her/his toes, then allow them to also take a bit of a rest. A phone call is enough, without having to be concerned with responding to emails. Further, whatever is promised about online "confidentiality," most are aware of the frequent breaches. I would not want my family's medical information hacked into, or printed out by a doctor's office employee for whatever purpose. Yes, it DOES happen. Technology is good; however, NOT in every area of life.
Posted by: cia malloy at April 23, 2008 3:19 AM
I'm a family medicine resident who MUCH prefers email to phone for non-urgent issues. I even started a blog as another means of communicating with patients.
I harbor the suspicion that many doctors don't want to use email because they type slowly! But I agree with the article - it's only a matter of time 'till email is the norm.
Posted by: G. A. at April 23, 2008 3:41 AM
I have two reasons why I prefer to communicate with patients via email rather than telephone:
1) It is more efficient. Both patients and I have complicated schedules and it is frustrating to play phone-tag.
2) It is a competitive market place and I feel that by providing better service (communication), I can compete better.
It certainly isn't for everyone. But I feel it is the direction we are heading. Particularly with the convergence of the phone/text/email/PDA/beeper.
Posted by: Nathan Bonilla-Warford at April 23, 2008 7:10 AM
I'm compiling a list of articles on this topic (here's the post that hooked me in anew).
I'm interested in medical journal articles (which I suspect will be the most influential among health professionals) as well as popular press accounts (like this AP story, which reach the rest of us). You can email me at sfox(at)pewinternet(dot)org.
Posted by: Susannah Fox at April 23, 2008 9:20 AM
It is very interesting to see that the MDs writing in support of email exchanges are clearly adopters of social networking technology, writing very active - and very interesting- blogs.
Inversely, the MDs against the use of email with patients do not seem to have understood that, in the world we are all developing together, medical knowledge is a network (one of the principle of participatory medicine).
Soon we will start real large scale implementations of PHR. When this happens only the doctors who have developed or transformed their practice to actively use email communication (or other forms of secure electronic communications) with their patients will be competitive!
Posted by: Gilles Frydman at April 23, 2008 10:15 AM
No one has mentioned the other side of "E" mailing your doctor. By calling the office the doctor can take the phone if he-she is able to according to time constraints--get the problem solved, or ask that the patient come into the office, and pass the phone to the assistant to make an appointment. If a doctor gets an "E" mail from a patient who may have a crush on them, where does the "E" mail stop?
Posted by: Arlene at April 23, 2008 11:37 AM
One reason that physicians won't send answers by e-mail is because they look upon everything as a risk for a lawsuit. Change the malpractice climate in our country and physicians will do a lot of things that will simplify communication and many others that will help to keep the cost of medical care down.
Posted by: E. J. Margulies, M.D. at April 24, 2008 9:20 AM
Hi, I'm a current senior high school student, and I’m doing a research on Universal Health Care. I would like to take just a few minutes out of your free time to ask you a couple of questions. Please reply as soon as possible to my e-mail below.
Thank-You,
Do you personally agree or disagree with consumer-direct health care reform?
Would consumer-direct insurance allow the people to buy insurance from other insurances?
80% of health costs contribute to preventable diseases, why doesn't the government focus on preventing diseases instead of cures? (In your opinion)
Should health care be a basic right?
Is health care something the U.S. should be focused on?
Why do most doctors change their work field? Does med school factor into the shortage of doctors we have?
Posted by: Flux at May 8, 2008 8:45 AM
I think that the best way with a doctor is telephone not email. Even I do not understand people who contact their doctors via email.
Posted by: Ambulance Doctor at May 15, 2008 10:51 AM
